Mark Zuckerberg wants a cut of your bookings. Good. That is not the bad news for hotels and airlines. The bad news would be paying Meta a fee and still losing the guest to someone else. The fee was always coming. What matters is what you get for it.
On Meta’s third-quarter earnings call, Zuckerberg called travel one of the “top use cases” for Muse, the company’s AI agent. He also said he is working out business models earlier than Meta usually would, including taking “a percent of the value that we are helping to create for people”. Skift has the full story.
A lot of travel marketers will read that and groan. Another middleman. Another commission. I think that reaction misses the point.
Nobody thought this was free
Let’s be honest about how travel already works. Google charges for hotel ads. OTAs charge commission. Metasearch charges per click. Every big platform that sends you demand takes a slice of it. Meta was never going to be the exception.
And Meta has something the others would love. Skift notes that Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger reach 3.64 billion people a day. That is where people already find destinations, follow travel creators and argue with friends about where to go. Meta shapes where people want to go long before they search for a price.
Muse is only about a month old, and it isn’t yet in front of all those users. It is on WhatsApp, with Meta’s AI glasses next. But the early numbers Meta shared are not nothing. More than 10 million people in the US and Canada set it up in roughly six weeks. About 25% use it every day. The average purchase value is above $200, travel included.
So yes, Meta will charge. The real question is what kind of deal you end up with.
Two very different ways to pay the toll
Look at how Meta is filling Muse with travel supply. Expedia Group is bringing hotel bookings. Duffel handles flights. And Cloudbeds, the hotel software company, has announced a link that connects Muse to live hotel rates and availability, with the reservation completed on the hotel’s own booking engine. That is due to roll out in the US in the first quarter of 2027.
Those are two very different futures for a hotel.
In the first, the guest asks Muse for a room and the booking flows through an OTA. You pay the OTA’s commission, and perhaps Meta’s share on top. The guest’s relationship sits with the intermediary. You are a room on a list.
In the second, Muse finds your live rate and the guest books directly with you. You may still pay Meta something. But you keep the booking, the guest and the chance to bring them back. Cloudbeds’ chief executive, Adam Harris, framed it as refusing to let another intermediary own the guest. I think he is right.
That is the choice. Not “fee or no fee”. It is “fee plus direct booking” or “fee plus OTA commission plus a lost guest”.
This is the deal window, and it is open now
I wrote earlier this week that hotels are waiting for AI bookings to grow while the deals get done without them. The earnings call makes that point sharper. Zuckerberg is openly saying the business model is being designed now. Business models set in year one tend to stick.
We have seen this pattern before. Google wrote the rules for AI hotel booking and hotels didn’t get a seat. Booking Holdings put $100m into an AI trip manager to buy its place in the trip early. The big players are not waiting for proof that AI agents sell rooms. They are buying position while it is cheap.
Independent hotels have the most to lose. If an agent can’t read your live rates, it can’t book you directly, so it books you through whoever it can read. As I argued when looking at why AI hasn’t heard of many independent hotels, being invisible to software is now a commercial problem, not a technical one.
What I’d do this quarter
- Ask your tech providers a direct question. Can your booking engine and PMS take bookings from AI agents like Muse, ChatGPT and Gemini, on your own engine? If the answer is vague, push for a date.
- Work out what an AI booking is worth to you. Compare a direct booking with a small platform fee against an OTA booking. Know your number before someone else sets it.
- Treat social as a booking channel, not just a brand channel. If Muse lives inside WhatsApp and Instagram, the content people see there is now close to the point of sale.
- Decide your red lines on guest data. A fee is negotiable. Losing the guest relationship for good is much harder to undo.
Muse’s economics are unproven, and it may stay small for a while. But the terms are being written now, not when the volume shows up.
So here is the debate. Is a Meta commission one more tax on travel brands, or the first AI deal that could actually send guests back to your own website? I lean towards the second, but only for the brands that turn up and ask for it. Where do you stand?
Want more takes like this? I share what AI is really doing to travel search, booking and marketing every week. Subscribe to my LinkedIn newsletter.