Princess Cruises has done something most travel brands are still only talking about. It has stopped waiting for customers to come to its website, and gone to where they are already planning: inside ChatGPT and Claude.
I think it is the right call. I also think plenty of brands will copy it for the wrong reasons.
What Princess actually launched
In late September, Princess launched what it calls the first app from a global cruise line inside ChatGPT. According to PhocusWire’s report on the launch, travellers can explore destinations, check pricing and availability, compare itineraries and ships, and look at onboard experiences and shore excursions, all inside a chat. Princess built it with travel tech firm Mobi, using the model context protocol, which is the plumbing that lets AI assistants talk to a company’s own systems.
Then on 5 October, as Cruise News reported, Princess turned up as a connector inside Claude too. A traveller can type something like “Find 7-day Caribbean sailings out of Fort Lauderdale” and get answers without opening a single browser tab.
Neena Vicente, Princess’s VP of digital commerce and experience, called it a “new entry point into cruise discovery”. That is exactly what it is.
Your website is no longer the front door
For twenty years, travel marketing has worked on one idea: get people to your site, then convert them. SEO, PPC, metasearch, email, the lot. All roads led home.
That idea is breaking. More and more trips start with a question typed into an AI assistant, not a search box. I wrote about this shift when I looked at how AI is reshaping the way young adults plan their holidays. The research phase is moving, and it is not moving back.
Princess has worked this out. Rather than polishing yet another chatbot on its own site and hoping people find it, it has put its inventory where the conversation is already happening. That is a smarter bet than most of the industry is making.
But here is the catch
Going into the chat window comes with a trade-off that nobody in the press releases wants to dwell on. The assistant owns the conversation. It owns the memory of what the traveller likes. It owns the comparison. Princess supplies the ships and the prices. ChatGPT and Claude supply everything the customer actually sees.
That is renting a shelf in someone else’s shop. It might be a very good shelf. But the shopkeeper decides where you sit, and whether the shopper sees your rival first.
There is also a big question still open. Cruise News points out that Princess has not said whether you can finish a booking inside Claude. If the connector returns live, bookable fares, it is a real sales channel. If it returns polished suggestions and a link back to princess.com, it is a brochure with a chat box on top.
We saw the same problem from the other side last week, when AI agents struggled to get rates from some big hotel brand sites. As I argued in Hilton’s AI agent problem is a gift to the OTAs, if the agent cannot get a price, the guest does not get a booking. A connector is only as good as the data behind it.
Do not write off the travel agents yet
The easy headline is “AI kills the cruise agent”. I do not buy it. PhocusWire notes Phocuswright research showing travel advisors account for nine out of ten cruises booked in the US. Cruises are complicated, expensive and full of extras. People like a human to check the details.
The smarter play is to give advisors the same tools. An advisor who can pull live sailings into a chat in seconds is faster, not redundant.
What travel marketers should do now
- Get your data clean. Prices, availability, room or cabin types and inclusions need to be accurate and machine-readable. Most brands are not there yet, as I found when looking at why hotels adopted AI but kept the spreadsheets.
- Treat AI assistants as a channel, not a gimmick. Someone needs to own it, measure it and report on it, the same way they would for paid search.
- Work on being recommended, not just listed. Not every brand will get a connector deal. Everyone can work on showing up in AI answers. That is what generative engine optimisation is for, and it sits alongside your SEO, not instead of it.
- Keep the relationship. If the first chat happens on ChatGPT, make sure the booking, the loyalty sign-up and the post-trip email still happen with you.
Airbnb is taking the opposite route, building AI search inside its own app, and I explained why that matters in Airbnb’s AI search isn’t late, it’s a warning to chatbot OTAs. Both routes can work. Doing neither cannot.
The debate worth having
So here is the question for every travel brand. Would you rather be inside the AI assistant, on its terms, or outside it, hoping it recommends you instead of a rival?
Princess has picked its side. Royal Caribbean, MSC and Norwegian now have to decide whether this is a press release or the start of a trend. My bet is the second. And the brands that wait for proof will be the ones paying to catch up.
Want more takes like this? Follow my LinkedIn newsletter for weekly thoughts on travel marketing, AI and search.